IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> see the accompanying table that gives growth of stock in million > troy ounces. Hi Paul C: What is the source for the table that you attached to your last message? / In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Paul Cockshott Fri 22 Apr 2005, 10:03 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Andrew Brown Fri 22 Apr 2005, 12:48 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Paul Cockshott Fri 22 Apr 2005, 14:55 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Paul Cockshott Fri 22 Apr 2005, 15:25 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, glevy Fri 22 Apr 2005, 15:39 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Ian Wright Fri 22 Apr 2005, 17:58 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Paul Cockshott Fri 22 Apr 2005, 15:45 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Andrew Brown Fri 22 Apr 2005, 16:42 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Paul Cockshott Fri 22 Apr 2005, 21:47 GMT