OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


 
 

- I don't know what a 'unitary rotation operator on amplitude space' is
Paul:

Just as well, that was a mistake, debt cancellation is not
unitary in amplitude space. The idea of amplitude space is
one that I presented in my seminar. But there are still some
mathematical bugs in that presentation. I spotted them this
afternoon working through it.
---------------

- Exchange is a value conserving process. Yes, but surplus value occurs
through, inter alia, exchange! Oh dear, here is a contradiction. So I
can 'match' the difficulty of your 'unitary rotation operator' with the
blatant, yet true (dialectical), contradiction that surplus value must
occur both within and without the sphere of exchange. 

----------------------

Why? Surplus value is just the necessary expression of there
being a net product outside of exchange.
 



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]