IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
John, Please refer to the article Jerry posted http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=41&ItemID=7610 which mentions Venezuela extensively as a counter-example of your position. I wonder what line you take in defensive of your own position. Could it be that the Bolivarian revolution is worthless and/or meaningless for you? Perhaps you only like Mondragon/Owenite- like experiments? Perhaps not even those? I was also surprised that you were pleased that the Revolutionary Communist Party - USA shares with you a focus on youth releasing rage. After all, the RCP-USA supports Shining Path, does it not? Perplexed, Paul Z. ************************************************************************* Vol.21-Neoliberalism in Crisis, Accumulation, and Rosa Luxemburg's Legacy RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY, Zarembka/Soederberg, eds, Elsevier Science ********************** http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka
- Re: [OPE-L] Yet another TP solution, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Yet another TP solution, Philip Dunn Thu 21 Apr 2005, 11:57 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Yet another TP solution, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 21 Apr 2005, 13:04 GMT
- [OPE-L] 1/2 of a dialectical dance and other fragments by Bertell Ollman, Gerald_A_Levy Sun 17 Apr 2005, 12:21 GMT
- [OPE-L] Upping the Anti / On the Barricades, Gerald_A_Levy Sat 16 Apr 2005, 17:46 GMT
- [OPE-L] Query to John Holloway: What's your position on the Bolivarian revolution?, Paul Zarembka Sat 16 Apr 2005, 13:28 GMT
- [OPE-L] [roywestjp@yahoo.co.jp: New Book on Marx's Labor Theory of Value], Hans G. Ehrbar Sat 16 Apr 2005, 05:54 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] New Book on Marx's Labor Theory of Value, Gerald_A_Levy Sat 16 Apr 2005, 06:10 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? cost, Andrew Brown Fri 15 Apr 2005, 15:55 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? cost, ajit sinha Sat 16 Apr 2005, 07:01 GMT