IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
In the message forwarded by Hans, Roy West <roywestjp@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The core of the book is the > first chapter, which introduces Marx's labor theory of > value by means of closely examining the first three chapters > (part one) of Capital and also critically examining the > ideas of those who have rejected Marx's theory (such as > Bohm-Bawkerk and the Japanese "Marxist" Uno Kozo.) To write that Uno rejected Marx's theory and to, in effect, question whether he was a Marxist (by writing "Marxist" Uno Kozo rather than Marxist Uno Kozo) is telling -- about West, I think. Hopefully, this is not a reflection on the Marxist Hayashi Hiroyoshi (note that West when referring to Hiroyoshi referred to him as a Marxist but referred to Uno as a "Marxist"). In solidarity, Jerry
- [OPE-L] 1/2 of a dialectical dance and other fragments by Bertell Ollman, Gerald_A_Levy Sun 17 Apr 2005, 12:21 GMT
- [OPE-L] Upping the Anti / On the Barricades, Gerald_A_Levy Sat 16 Apr 2005, 17:46 GMT
- [OPE-L] Query to John Holloway: What's your position on the Bolivarian revolution?, Paul Zarembka Sat 16 Apr 2005, 13:28 GMT
- [OPE-L] [roywestjp@yahoo.co.jp: New Book on Marx's Labor Theory of Value], Hans G. Ehrbar Sat 16 Apr 2005, 05:54 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] New Book on Marx's Labor Theory of Value, Gerald_A_Levy Sat 16 Apr 2005, 06:10 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? cost, Andrew Brown Fri 15 Apr 2005, 15:55 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? cost, ajit sinha Sat 16 Apr 2005, 07:01 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? cost, Ian Wright Sat 16 Apr 2005, 19:06 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? cost, ajit sinha Tue 19 Apr 2005, 13:14 GMT