IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> And you're still not speak to it.
Actually I did, as anyone who reads the original question
you asked will see.
------------------------------
To everyone else: note the context of this thread. It
concerned a report on a trend for decreasing wages in the US.
You would be forgiven for forgetting that context given the
nature of his comments.
It's my fault. I shouldn't have replied to his question to begin
with. I should have known better. I apologize to everyone else
(save one) on the list. I have nothing more to say to him.
In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 13 Apr 2005, 20:22 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Gerald_A_Levy Sat 16 Apr 2005, 12:02 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 13 Apr 2005, 22:46 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 14 Apr 2005, 01:43 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 14 Apr 2005, 02:14 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 14 Apr 2005, 15:35 GMT
- [OPE-L] Critique of Holloway on State Power, glevy Mon 11 Apr 2005, 13:25 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Critique of Holloway on State Power, John Holloway Fri 15 Apr 2005, 21:00 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Critique of Holloway on State Power, Gerald_A_Levy Sat 16 Apr 2005, 06:18 GMT