IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
How many questions were asked in the following? I count one (1).
And you're still not speak to it. Are you saying that this signing and ratifying were done freely? Who exactly signs and ratifies freely so that the contracts can be binding?
rb
- Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 13 Apr 2005, 10:02 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 13 Apr 2005, 20:22 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Gerald_A_Levy Sat 16 Apr 2005, 12:02 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 13 Apr 2005, 22:46 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 14 Apr 2005, 01:43 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 14 Apr 2005, 02:14 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 14 Apr 2005, 15:35 GMT
- [OPE-L] Critique of Holloway on State Power, glevy Mon 11 Apr 2005, 13:25 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Critique of Holloway on State Power, John Holloway Fri 15 Apr 2005, 21:00 GMT