OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog?



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


> I originally used Ricardo's theory to illustrate that differential rent
> could seen as the wages of non-human labour-power.  This means
> that the landlord is selling a commodity but not, qua landlord,
> producing one capitalistically.  This idea is not tied to Ricardo.

Hi Phil,

It is tied to the Ricardian inability to formulate a theory of surplus
value.  Once such a theory is formulated -- and once one recognizes
divergences of value from price -- then one can conceptualize the
*transfer of surplus value* among capitalists and from capitalists to
landlords in the form of rent.

In solidarity, Jerry



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]