IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> I originally used Ricardo's theory to illustrate that differential rent > could seen as the wages of non-human labour-power. This means > that the landlord is selling a commodity but not, qua landlord, > producing one capitalistically. This idea is not tied to Ricardo. Hi Phil, It is tied to the Ricardian inability to formulate a theory of surplus value. Once such a theory is formulated -- and once one recognizes divergences of value from price -- then one can conceptualize the *transfer of surplus value* among capitalists and from capitalists to landlords in the form of rent. In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog?, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog?, Gerald_A_Levy Sat 09 Apr 2005, 22:42 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog?, Philip Dunn Sun 10 Apr 2005, 09:04 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog?, michael a. lebowitz Sun 10 Apr 2005, 14:49 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog?, Philip Dunn Mon 11 Apr 2005, 07:47 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog?, Gerald_A_Levy Mon 11 Apr 2005, 18:49 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog?, Philip Dunn Tue 12 Apr 2005, 07:10 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog?, Gerald_A_Levy Tue 12 Apr 2005, 11:59 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo on the value of manufactured goods, or does the tail wag the dog?, Philip Dunn Thu 14 Apr 2005, 07:55 GMT
- [OPE-L] labour-power as a (quasi-) commodity, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 14 Apr 2005, 11:56 GMT