OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]

Date: [ Previous | Next ] Thread: [ Previous | Next ] Index: [ Author | Date | Thread ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

[OPE-L] The Neoclassical Marxists

To: OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OPE-L] The Neoclassical Marxists
From: Gerald_A_Levy@xxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:50:23 -0400
Comments: RFC822 error: <W> MESSAGE-ID field duplicated. Last occurrence was retained.

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.

Ian and everyone else,

Also see the following additional paper ("The Neoclassical Marxists")
by Hasan Gurak:

< http://econwpa.wustl.edu:8089/eps/get/papers/0309/0309004.pdf >

In solidarity, Jerry

References:
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?
  - From: Nicola Taylor
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?
  - From: Ian Wright
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?
  - From: Gerald_A_Levy

Prev by Date: Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?
Next by Date: Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?
Previous by thread: Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?
Next by thread: Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, (continued)
  - Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Andrew Brown Thu 07 Apr 2005, 14:05 GMT
    - Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Nicola Taylor Thu 07 Apr 2005, 15:42 GMT
  - Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Andrew Brown Thu 07 Apr 2005, 15:42 GMT
    - Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, glevy Thu 07 Apr 2005, 18:58 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]