IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> I think Andy has introduced something tremendously important when he > emphasises creativity, and it seems to me that this property is > precisely a forces of production property. Creativity implies > processes of induction and dynamic change, i.e. innovation, something > that static approaches do not deal with. Hi Ian, Well, if you think it's important to emphasize human creativity ... I'd be curious to hear what Andy and you and others on the list think of the perspectives of Hasan Gurak in "On Value and Price: an alternative approach to value/price theory": < http://www.tek.org.tr/tartisma/pdf/Gurak1-Value-Price.pdf > In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Ian Wright Fri 08 Apr 2005, 20:25 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Gerald_A_Levy Sat 09 Apr 2005, 13:02 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Philip Dunn Sat 09 Apr 2005, 21:01 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Gerald_A_Levy Sat 09 Apr 2005, 22:40 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Gerald_A_Levy Fri 08 Apr 2005, 13:34 GMT
- [OPE-L] The Neoclassical Marxists, Gerald_A_Levy Fri 08 Apr 2005, 13:49 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Andrew Brown Thu 07 Apr 2005, 14:05 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Nicola Taylor Thu 07 Apr 2005, 15:42 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Andrew Brown Thu 07 Apr 2005, 15:42 GMT