IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hi all, Am away on holdiay for the week. Many thanks to all for the very stimuating discussion. Hope to return to it in a week's time Andy
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Nicola Taylor Fri 08 Apr 2005, 03:08 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Ian Wright Fri 08 Apr 2005, 04:30 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Rakesh Bhandari Fri 08 Apr 2005, 04:41 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Rakesh Bhandari Fri 08 Apr 2005, 19:21 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Andrew Brown Fri 08 Apr 2005, 10:53 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Paul Cockshott Sat 09 Apr 2005, 09:26 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Ian Wright Mon 11 Apr 2005, 20:37 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 11 Apr 2005, 21:11 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Paul Cockshott Tue 12 Apr 2005, 12:12 GMT