IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
Well, mine ends up recognising labour time
as the fundamental unit of cost in any society. And it recognises the product
as an embodiment of labour in any society. Then the inversion of capitalism turns ‘embodied’
labour into ‘congealed’ abstract labour and it is obvious that SNLT
is its measure. This often tends to be denied in systematic dialectics despite,
for example, Chris’s excellent ‘Dialectics of Labour’ from
which I draw quite a lot (e.g. labour as concrete universal). Am much closer to
Chris than others on these matters – perhaps my differences with Chris
stem more from other aspects such as the basics of materialist dialectics
whereby exchange value is clear evidence of a power and hence *must* have a material grounding. Andy -----Original
Message----- Andy, actually, an argument has
been presented many times. Have you seriously read Reuten, Williams
and Chris Arthur on the distinction between labour and labour power? How is your conception of
labour (and labour power) different from theirs? Nicky
Find local movie times
and trailers on Yahoo! Movies. |
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Nicola Taylor Thu 07 Apr 2005, 16:06 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 07 Apr 2005, 19:11 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Andrew Brown Thu 07 Apr 2005, 16:15 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Nicola Taylor Thu 07 Apr 2005, 16:23 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Andrew Brown Thu 07 Apr 2005, 16:31 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Nicola Taylor Thu 07 Apr 2005, 16:49 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? cost, Christopher Arthur Wed 13 Apr 2005, 22:12 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Andrew Brown Thu 07 Apr 2005, 18:04 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?, Andrew Brown Thu 07 Apr 2005, 21:04 GMT