IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> The norm would be for > wages to represent a roughly stable share of GNP and for > accumulation to increase the stock of constant capital. Paul C, What are some empirical estimates of the monetary value of the stock of c as a percentage of GNP (or GDP)? Is the long-term empirical trend for this percentage to remain stable, decrease, or increase? (Note that I am not asking for a theoretical claim one way or another -- just empirical estimates in as many countries and time periods that list members are aware of.) In solidarity, Jerry PS: where we have both GNP and GDP data, which one should Marxians use? Why?
- [OPE-L] A Visit with John Holloway: How to Change the World Without Taking Power, Rakesh Bhandari Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:02 GMT
- [OPE-L] Fabio Ravagnani on the Macro-Monetary interpretation of Marx's theory, Gerald_A_Levy Sun 03 Apr 2005, 16:38 GMT
- [OPE-L] Frank Thompson's Homepage, glevy Sun 03 Apr 2005, 12:11 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Frank Thompson's Homepage, Paul Cockshott Mon 04 Apr 2005, 09:10 GMT
- [OPE-L] estimates of the value of c as a % of GNP?, Gerald_A_Levy Mon 04 Apr 2005, 18:26 GMT
- [OPE-L] _Journal of Australian Political Economy_ website, glevy Sat 02 Apr 2005, 18:31 GMT
- [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s, glevy Sat 02 Apr 2005, 13:18 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s, Alejandro Valle Baeza Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:23 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s, glevy Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:32 GMT