IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hi Howard > I also agree, of course, with your point about the Hegelian strand and would > add that the distinction one finds between logic and cause drives a wedge > between Marx and science. I didn't understand this last bit. If you get the opportunity, could you expand on it? ATB, -Ian.
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Andrew Brown Thu 17 Feb 2005, 09:56 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Howard Engelskirchen Fri 18 Feb 2005, 04:23 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Andrew Brown Fri 18 Feb 2005, 09:37 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Howard Engelskirchen Fri 18 Feb 2005, 15:27 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Ian Wright Fri 18 Feb 2005, 16:44 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Howard Engelskirchen Mon 21 Feb 2005, 14:47 GMT
- [OPE-L] the dialectic of labour, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 15 Feb 2005, 20:17 GMT
- [OPE-L] Alf Hornborg, negentropy and the material basis of accumulation, Gerald_A_Levy Mon 14 Feb 2005, 13:24 GMT
- [OPE-L] Uniquely American: Bush's Compassionate Conservatism, glevy Sun 13 Feb 2005, 15:00 GMT