IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Andy and Howard: thank you both for your replies. [Andy wrote:] > On the Bhaskar list the recent thread you refer to is quite an > isolated instance though there has been the odd individual in the > past who has defended similar views on the list, (in a slightly > better way than the recent thread, imo). By whom and when? I should note that George Moore -- the author of the post I called attention to -- was removed from the critical-realism list. I hadn't noticed that previously. In solidarity, Jerry PS: My last reply to Phil had more than the usual amount of typos for which I apologize. In particular, the following word (which I will CAPITALIZE) should have been added to the sentence: > The above is in NO way intended as a criticism of your > mode of problem-solving -- it works for you and many > others.
- [OPE-L] Capitale Sociale .it / ARPE, Gerald_A_Levy Fri 18 Feb 2005, 13:16 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Philip Dunn Thu 17 Feb 2005, 16:47 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 17 Feb 2005, 18:08 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] today's critical scientific realism, Andrew Brown Thu 17 Feb 2005, 14:09 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] today's critical scientific realism, Gerald_A_Levy Fri 18 Feb 2005, 13:30 GMT
- [OPE-L] Fwd: Marx's Form of Analysis, glevy Thu 17 Feb 2005, 13:16 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Fwd: Marx's Form of Analysis, Andrew Brown Thu 17 Feb 2005, 13:59 GMT
- [OPE-L] Fwd: Marx's Form of Analysis, glevy Sat 19 Feb 2005, 19:55 GMT
- [OPE-L] Fwd: Marx's Form of Analysis, John Milios Sun 20 Feb 2005, 03:10 GMT