IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Jurrien wrote: the argument that what makes commodities commensurable in exchange is the fact that they are products of labor is not really tenable; this reduces to a tautology. After all, it could just as well be argued that this commensurability derives simply from the fact that they are offered for exchange or are able to be exchanged, or have a price. I reply: But the question is why do they have a *socially given* price? Answer: because they are commensurable as values. Andy
- Re: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 17 Feb 2005, 18:08 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] today's critical scientific realism, Andrew Brown Thu 17 Feb 2005, 14:09 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] today's critical scientific realism, Gerald_A_Levy Fri 18 Feb 2005, 13:30 GMT
- [OPE-L] Fwd: Marx's Form of Analysis, glevy Thu 17 Feb 2005, 13:16 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Fwd: Marx's Form of Analysis, Andrew Brown Thu 17 Feb 2005, 13:59 GMT
- [OPE-L] Fwd: Marx's Form of Analysis, glevy Sat 19 Feb 2005, 19:55 GMT
- [OPE-L] Fwd: Marx's Form of Analysis, John Milios Sun 20 Feb 2005, 03:10 GMT
- [OPE-L] Fwd: Marx's Form of Analysis, glevy Sun 20 Feb 2005, 13:43 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Gerald_A_Levy Sun 20 Feb 2005, 15:09 GMT