IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Howard, You make a very important point, very well. Do you think that your specific application of scientific realism (and Aristotle) to Marx's argument on value was already present in early works such as Keat and Urry, Derek Sayer, or even Bhaskar's early stuff? (I don't think so myself, hence the high importance of your argument, imo). Many thanks, Andy
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 16 Feb 2005, 08:02 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Howard Engelskirchen Thu 17 Feb 2005, 02:03 GMT
- [OPE-L] today's critical scientific realism, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 17 Feb 2005, 13:48 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] today's critical scientific realism, Howard Engelskirchen Fri 18 Feb 2005, 04:13 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Andrew Brown Thu 17 Feb 2005, 09:56 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Howard Engelskirchen Fri 18 Feb 2005, 04:23 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Andrew Brown Fri 18 Feb 2005, 09:37 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Howard Engelskirchen Fri 18 Feb 2005, 15:27 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Ian Wright Fri 18 Feb 2005, 16:44 GMT