IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hans, just to let you know I ( as usual) agree with you. I think it is quite clear from Engels afterword to Vol 3, what Marx shows is how the law of value works itself out as capitalism develops, in a way which is not obvious to the partcipants or observers ( rather as Ricardo's trade theory was not intuitively obvious as Smith's was, if this isn't a misleading analogy at scientific progress). PS I downloaded all your pdf files but whether I'll get round to reading them I don't know!!! Paul Bullock. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hans G. Ehrbar" <ehrbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 4:20 PM Subject: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis > Jerry, you are right, I should not have called them "private > producers" but "private individuals who make the decisions > about production." But I disagree with you (and I think > others on this list) if you say value as a category can only > be grasped if there is wage labor. Say in a situation where > all commodities that can be purchased in a society are > produced by private producers who own their means of > production, then > > (a) you will probably have a rough correspondence between > exchange values and labor time (although this probably > depends very much on it how easy it is for the producers to > change between different lines of production, and I would > also expect that there is a strong conventional element to > both prices and production methods), > > (b) but with much higher certainty I would assume that there > is money > > and (c) I would also expect that some people hoard money. > > All these are effects of the social relation "value". > > > Hans. > > > > 2. Hans: > > >> The private producers have human labour-power at their > >> disposal and they have to decide what products to produce > >> and what technology to use. > > > At the risk of stating the obvious -- > > > Within any class society, the producers do not in general > > decide what to produce or what technology to use. These > > decisions are made by those with the power to make them: > > by capitalists under capitalism, slave-owners under slavery, > > feudal lords under feudalism, etc. The producers only make > > these decisions in exceptional circumstances under capitalism: > > e.g. in worker-owned producer cooperatives. Even then, > > they have limited power because (unless they own a natural > > monopoly) the force of competition will tend to impose choices > > on them. > > >> The market gives them the information necessary to do this > >> only if the market participants equate all their commodities > >> to one standard, i.e. money > > > What the producers lack under capitalism is not "the > > information necessary"; what they lack is ownership and > > control of the means of production. Value can not be > > adequately grasped as a specific social relation without > > reference to the later stages of Marx's analysis, including > > Ch. 6 of Volume 1. > > > In solidarity, Jerry > >
- Re: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Howard Engelskirchen Tue 15 Feb 2005, 08:19 GMT
- [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Hans G. Ehrbar Tue 15 Feb 2005, 12:59 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Gerald_A_Levy Tue 15 Feb 2005, 15:30 GMT
- [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Hans G. Ehrbar Tue 15 Feb 2005, 16:20 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Paul Bullock Tue 15 Feb 2005, 23:02 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 16 Feb 2005, 13:39 GMT
- [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Hans G. Ehrbar Wed 16 Feb 2005, 17:10 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Marx's Form of Analysis, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 16 Feb 2005, 19:43 GMT