IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
A message sent on July 7 to Kapital_Gang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx by
redkronstad. What is the answer to the "Paradox of Rib Tips"?
In solidarity, Jerry
========================================================
Comrades,
4th of July and I was eating BBQ at my brother's and I was thinking about
the Law of Value.
Now, as I understand it, the value (v) of a commodity is the sum
total of the congealed labor in it in the form of dead labor
(constant capital =means of production = previous labors) or (c)
congealed alongside the paid amount (value) of living labor (v) which
goes on off into in its production plus the surplus value (s) which is
the non-paid portion of said living labor. Or
v = c + v + s or k + s where k = (c + v)
This, of course, is notwithstanding the transformation of this value (in
Vol 1, Chap IX) into price of production (Pp) (in Vol 3, Chap IX) such
that
v = (c + v) x (1 + P') or k(1 + P')
where P' is the general rate of profit
And this, in spite of the errors inherent in the simplification that is
the above, is similarly,
not withstanding.
Yeah, as I munched, I was ruminating on the Law of Value.
Now, as I see it, the difference between ribs and rib tips, aside from
The texture (Quality: of no importance in the below)
The size (Quantity: of some importance in the below)
The cost (Quantity: of prime importance in the below)
As I visualize it the only essential thing that really differentiates
ribs from rib tips is the swipe of the knife that separates the whole rib
into rib and rib tips. That's it. The very same act, the swipe of the
cutting tool, 'creates' ribs and simultaneously creates rib tips.
Now, let us look at their 'values' as defined above.
In any given pig there are would be ribs and rib tips existing,
cohabiting alongside each other as the pig's ribs. In the very same pig
they are
1. Bought or born into ownership (c in the form of invested
capital)
2. Sheltered (c in the form of fixed capital)
3. Fed (c in the form of circulating capital)
4. Tended (by v in the form of labor engaged in what could
be called
Production Process A .
5. Slaughtered (by v in Production Process B) and
6. Separated into ribs and rib tips (by v in Production
Process C.)
At every step these two erstwhile commodities share identical costs of
production. And yet, in spite of the fact that there is a greater weight
per pig of ribs than rib tips, at any given BBQ stand a, say, pound of
ribs will cost you more than a pound of rib tips. Why?
Best,
Red Kronstadt
- Re: [OPE-L] conference on income distributions, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] conference on income distributions, glevy Thu 10 Feb 2005, 16:25 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] conference on income distributions, Paul Cockshott Thu 10 Feb 2005, 16:41 GMT
- [OPE-L] From the Ashes of the Old: An Interview with David Laibman, glevy Wed 09 Feb 2005, 17:09 GMT
- [OPE-L] Loren Goldner, "Marx and Makhno Meet Macdonalds", Gerald_A_Levy Tue 08 Feb 2005, 19:44 GMT
- [OPE-L] The Law of Value and Rib Tips, glevy Tue 08 Feb 2005, 16:35 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] The Law of Value and Rib Tips, Philip Dunn Tue 08 Feb 2005, 21:55 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] The Law of Value and Rib Tips, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 09 Feb 2005, 13:42 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] The Law of Value and Rib Tips, Philip Dunn Wed 09 Feb 2005, 23:58 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] The Law of Value and Rib Tips, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 10 Feb 2005, 13:09 GMT