IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> Why did you have troubles opening it? Hans, I think the reason was simply because it was a large file. > Vorstellen is an interesting word, and I added a chapter > about it, which I will upload tomorrow or so. I found 61 > occurrences of this word in *Capital I*. He also used it in many of his other writings on political economy. > I see three different uses: > > (1) Sometimes it means a prescientific thought, idea, hunch, > imagination. This term comes from Hegel, sometimes > translated with picture-thinking. > > (2) Sometimes it means the same or something very similar to > darstellen, represent. > > (3) The third meaning of "vorgestellt" is: notional, as > opposed to real. Another German synonym for this meaning is > ideell (not ideal, there is a difference between the two). Thanks. So, how does one go about deciding _which_ of these meanings/ translations is intended by Marx in a particular instance? Did Hegel also use vorstellung, in some contexts, to mean (2) and (3)? In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: [OPE-L] profits, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] profits, Gerald_A_Levy Fri 11 Feb 2005, 15:14 GMT
- [OPE-L] New Version of Capital Annotations, Hans G. Ehrbar Fri 04 Feb 2005, 17:38 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] New Version of Capital Annotations, Gerald_A_Levy Fri 04 Feb 2005, 20:03 GMT
- [OPE-L] New Version of Capital Annotations, Hans G. Ehrbar Sat 05 Feb 2005, 04:38 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] New Version of Capital Annotations, glevy Sat 05 Feb 2005, 14:45 GMT
- [OPE-L] New Version of Capital Annotations, Hans G. Ehrbar Mon 07 Feb 2005, 02:31 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] New Version of Capital Annotations, Gerald_A_Levy Mon 07 Feb 2005, 23:48 GMT
- [OPE-L] New Version of Capital Annotations, Hans G. Ehrbar Fri 11 Feb 2005, 22:48 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] New Version of Capital Annotations, Gerald_A_Levy Sat 12 Feb 2005, 00:57 GMT