IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
> Jerry, in my view that is a real text book. A real text book is
> produced only by teachers who are deeply involved into
> communicate with students. Gouverneur spent a lot of time
> teaching the issues of the book; hence most of the material was
> tested by experience. As any other good text book, it is well
> organized: exposition, resume, etc.
Hi Alejandro:
I still haven't had luck downloading and opening-up
the Gouverneur
book, but I agree with you that there is a need for
good introductory
texts and that writing a text requires special
skills.
Happily, there have been several other introductory
texts written
in recent years including Charles Andrews'
_From Capitalism to
Equality_ (Needle Press, 2000), N.S.
Ranganayakamma's _An
Introduction to Marx's 'Capital'_ (Sweet
Home Publications, 3
volumes, 1999) and Ben Fine and Alfredo Saad-Filho
_Marx's
Capital_ (4th ed., Pluto Press,
2004). Since the subject of
Gouverneur's book is on capitalism, rather than
Marx's _Capital_,
it might be better suited for an introductory
economics text than
the latter two books (which could be assigned for
courses on Marx
or perhaps as 'supplementary' texts for other
courses).
_From Capitalism to Equality_ could be
used in an introductory
course although I haven't used it for that
purpose. Paul Z, didn't
you assign that book in 1 or more of your
courses? How did it
go?
Increasingly, more and more colleges in the US --
under the guise
of "standardization" -- have mandated specific
(marginalist, of
course) texts for introductory courses. Is
this also an international
trend? This obviously restricts one's
ability to assign the text
that one prefers. In the past (before there
was a "uniform" required
economics text) I had assigned a couple of radical
introductory
economics texts -- Samuel Bowles and Richard Edwards
_Understanding Capitalism: Competition, Command, and Change in
the U.S. Economy_ (2nd ed., Harper
Collins, 1993; I also used the
1st edition) ) and Francis Green
and Bob Sutcliffe _The Profit System_
(Penguin, 1987). Both are long since out-of-print. Of the 2 I much
preferred Bowles and Edwards because it really was laid out as a
text with definitions in the margins, understandable graphs, a glossary,
etc. and was extremely well-written. It
even had an instructor's
manual! OTOH, _The Profit System_
was far less expensive (with a
list price at the time of US$7.95).
There were, of course, some issues
on which I disagreed with the authors of both
texts, but that's OK. I
don't mind interjecting my own perspective in class
that differs with the
authors of a text -- indeed, I think it is
important from the perspective of
encouraging the students to _critically_
engage the contents of a text
even when the text is progressive.
For a class at Pratt Institute in the Fall on
"Capitalism and Socialism"
I've decided to try something new. I've decided to
assign Katy Siegel
and Paul Mattick _Art Works: Money_
(Thames & Hudson, 2004) for
the capitalism part of the course. Their book
is an _art text_ so this will
be a bit of an experiment. I thought this was
worth a try because the
overwhelming amount of the students who take
the course are art and
design students. I'd like to use the
_graphics_ in the text as a way of
stimulating discussion about capitalism. It's
an unconventional approach
but I think it's important for faculty to try new
things in the classroom.
Gouverneur's text has two _huge_
advantages over other heterodox
texts: students can download it for free and it is
written in English,
French, and Spanish. In recent years I have
attempted with some
success to substitute free online sources for
expensive printed texts.
This is a move that has been welcomed with cheers
and applause in
some of my classes! When you consider the price of
some of the
standard texts, you will appreciate why there was
this enthusiastic
response. In some areas, a lot of students are
bilingual and having
the ability to assign a text that can be read in
Spanish or French is
a distinct advantage.
I'd be interested in knowing -- to the extent that
listmembers are able
to and have assigned heterodox texts for
introductory economics
courses -- what texts they use and what their
experience has been.
> In adition of that, Gouverneur's book has original material for
> understanding or develop Marxian thinking. I will give an example
> of this in a next post.
Yes, please.
In solidarity, Jerry
|
- [OPE-L] 'Porto Alegre Consensus' ?, Gerald_A_Levy Tue 01 Feb 2005, 22:38 GMT
- [OPE-L] Marta Speaks on Latin America and Venezuela in Transformation, Gerald_A_Levy Tue 01 Feb 2005, 22:37 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Jacques Gouverneur's new text on Marxist economics, Gerald_A_Levy Tue 01 Feb 2005, 12:52 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Jacques Gouverneur's new text on Marxist economics, Alejandro Valle Baeza Tue 01 Feb 2005, 17:10 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Jacques Gouverneur's new text on Marxist economics, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 02 Feb 2005, 14:08 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Jacques Gouverneur's new text on Marxist economics, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 02 Feb 2005, 18:30 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Jacques Gouverneur's new text on Marxist economics, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 02 Feb 2005, 22:24 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Jacques Gouverneur's new text on Marxist economics, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 03 Feb 2005, 08:22 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Jacques Gouverneur's new text on Marxist economics, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 03 Feb 2005, 15:44 GMT