IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Thanks for the question, Jerry, The answer is that the same laws apply, e.g. surplus labour quantitatively tethers its own form of appearance (money form of surplus value), whereever and whenever you look at capitalism. Many thanks, Andy -----Original Message----- From: OPE-L on behalf of Gerald_A_Levy@xxxxxxx Sent: Wed 26/01/2005 13:17 To: OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Subject: [OPE-L] commensurability of value > The reason is that without value there is no commensurability of > different capitalist systems across space or through time, making > general laws, so general science, impossible. Andy: How _exactly_ *with a concept of value* is there commensurability across space and time? How e.g. is value created in Germany in 1860 made commensurable with value created in Japan in the 1990's? In solidarity, Jerry PS: > In everyday life > we all believe value exists - e.g. we don't stare bemused when we are > told the GDP growth of a nation - but the Sraffian argument purports to > refute this existence. I'll put this to the test: next time I see Gary I'll mention US GDP and see if he blankly stares off into space.
- [OPE-L] Upping the Anti, Gerald_A_Levy Fri 28 Jan 2005, 23:21 GMT
- [OPE-L] Free Trade & International Concentration and Centralization of Capital, glevy Thu 27 Jan 2005, 16:36 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] commensurability of value, Paul Cockshott Wed 26 Jan 2005, 13:32 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] commensurability of value, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 26 Jan 2005, 15:10 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] commensurability of value, Andrew Brown Wed 26 Jan 2005, 18:23 GMT
- [OPE-L] Walden Bello, Asfilho Wed 26 Jan 2005, 07:15 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Walden Bello, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 26 Jan 2005, 13:16 GMT
- [OPE-L] Walden Bello on Assassination List, glevy Tue 25 Jan 2005, 13:46 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Walden Bello on Assassination List, Asfilho Tue 25 Jan 2005, 13:55 GMT