IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
I think the link is to money-capital as the form of capital in general.
Michael, There are problems, I think, with the thesis that capital in general can be represented synecdochically, especially as money capital. This dovetails with the idea that capital can in general be abolished through the abolition of interest or the euthansia of the rentier. I would suggest that capital in general does not exist only as a synecdoche but rather as a concrete individual.
Yours, Rakesh
- Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 17 Jan 2005, 22:14 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence, michael a. lebowitz Tue 18 Jan 2005, 05:06 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence, Hanno Pahl Tue 18 Jan 2005, 12:24 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence, Hanno Pahl Tue 18 Jan 2005, 12:33 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 18 Jan 2005, 18:15 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 19 Jan 2005, 17:35 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence, Gerald_A_Levy Tue 18 Jan 2005, 14:09 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence, Hanno Pahl Tue 18 Jan 2005, 22:25 GMT
- [OPE-L] capital in general and the world market, Gerald_A_Levy Tue 18 Jan 2005, 23:18 GMT