IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On Sunday 30 May 2004 01:02, glevy@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi Paul C. > > > The mystery is solved when one realises that money is not a > > substance but a technology of record. > > When there is a money commodity then money has both a > substance and is a symbol. > > In solidarity, Jerry Can you cite a historical instance of a money commodity in a capitalist society?
- (OPE-L) On the mango theory of money, (continued)
- (OPE-L) On the mango theory of money, Gerald A. Levy Mon 24 May 2004, 11:49 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) On the mango theory of money, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 24 May 2004, 15:15 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) On the mango theory of money, Paul C Sat 29 May 2004, 20:12 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: On the mango theory of money, glevy Sun 30 May 2004, 00:25 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: On the mango theory of money, Paul Cockshott Sun 30 May 2004, 19:52 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: On the mango theory of money, glevy Mon 31 May 2004, 00:56 GMT
- Re: on money, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 24 May 2004, 15:25 GMT
- Re: on money, ajit sinha Tue 25 May 2004, 10:51 GMT
- Re: on money, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 25 May 2004, 18:35 GMT