IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hi Costas: On the other hand, the approach of seeking to derive money as claim to > wealth, which you associate with Schumpeter, is problematic. The reason > is that it makes money's emergence essentially exogenous to the process > of exchange. The usual reference for this approach is Knapp and there > are many other Austrians and Germans, including Weber. They typically > rely on forces outside the market (the state, law, etc) to determine the > claim to wealth represented by money. I prefer endogenous explanations, > when available. The state is " exogeneous" to what? Surely not capitalism. In solidarity, Jerry
- Money and Mind, (continued)
- Money and Mind, Andrew Brown Fri 28 May 2004, 11:34 GMT
- Re: Money and Mind, Ian Wright Fri 28 May 2004, 22:59 GMT
- (OPE-L) on money, capital, and the state, glevy Sun 30 May 2004, 00:25 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) on money, capital, and the state, Riccardo Bellofiore Mon 31 May 2004, 09:15 GMT
- On the right to strike, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 24 May 2004, 00:44 GMT
- Iraq's revolt in 1920 A.G. NOORANI, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 24 May 2004, 00:44 GMT
- replies, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 25 May 2004, 16:49 GMT