IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Paul Zarembka wrote:
The first use of the word Value in Volume 1 comes right after describing labor in the abstract. So where do you find in Marx that Value goes beyond a context of labor in the abstract (is indepedent of the commoditization of labor power, thus buying and selling of labor power which he will discuss a bit later)?
There is a shift here in your presentation from abstract labour to the buying and selling of labour power. If the distinction between labour and labour power means anything, your equation can surely not be retained.
- Re: on money, (continued)
- Re: on money, Paul Zarembka Tue 25 May 2004, 12:21 GMT
- Re: on money, Howard Engelskirchen Tue 25 May 2004, 15:51 GMT
- Re: on money, Paul Zarembka Tue 25 May 2004, 16:53 GMT
- Re: on money, Howard Engelskirchen Wed 26 May 2004, 04:23 GMT
- Re: on money, Paul C Sat 29 May 2004, 20:54 GMT
- Re: on money, Paul Zarembka Sun 30 May 2004, 00:25 GMT
- Re: on money, Paul Cockshott Sun 30 May 2004, 19:55 GMT
- Re: on money, Howard Engelskirchen Sun 30 May 2004, 18:40 GMT
- Re: on money, Howard Engelskirchen Tue 25 May 2004, 15:33 GMT