OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: on money



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


Howard,

In your interpretation 'value' is independent of the buying and selling of
labor power, independent of the capitalist mode of production, and exists
in C-M-C, simple commodity exchange?

Paul

*************************************************************************
Vol.21-Neoliberalism in Crisis, Accumulation, and Rosa Luxemburg's Legacy
RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY, Zarembka/Soederberg, eds, Elsevier Science
********************** http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka


On Mon, 24 May 2004, Howard Engelskirchen wrote:

> ....  But for Marx,
> value is not something a commodity has; value constitutes a commodity.
> If a product of labor doesn't have value, then it is not a commodity.
> Value constitutes what a commodity is.



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]