IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Howard, In your interpretation 'value' is independent of the buying and selling of labor power, independent of the capitalist mode of production, and exists in C-M-C, simple commodity exchange? Paul ************************************************************************* Vol.21-Neoliberalism in Crisis, Accumulation, and Rosa Luxemburg's Legacy RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY, Zarembka/Soederberg, eds, Elsevier Science ********************** http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka On Mon, 24 May 2004, Howard Engelskirchen wrote: > .... But for Marx, > value is not something a commodity has; value constitutes a commodity. > If a product of labor doesn't have value, then it is not a commodity. > Value constitutes what a commodity is.
- Re: on money, (continued)
- Re: on money, ajit sinha Wed 26 May 2004, 08:01 GMT
- Re: on money, Paul C Sat 29 May 2004, 20:54 GMT
- Re: on money, Howard Engelskirchen Tue 25 May 2004, 02:49 GMT
- Re: Primitive accumulation, Michael Williams Tue 25 May 2004, 09:25 GMT
- Re: on money, Paul Zarembka Tue 25 May 2004, 12:21 GMT
- Re: on money, Howard Engelskirchen Tue 25 May 2004, 15:51 GMT
- Re: on money, Paul Zarembka Tue 25 May 2004, 16:53 GMT
- Re: on money, Howard Engelskirchen Wed 26 May 2004, 04:23 GMT
- Re: on money, Paul C Sat 29 May 2004, 20:54 GMT