IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hi Michael P. and Paul C. > The Economic Report of the President suggest that they should be > classified as manufacturing workers!!! Yes, I understood that. The real [unstated, political] reason for the change in classification by the Bush administration is obvious. What is not so obvious to me is whether list members "agree that the macworkers are not only exploited but also the source of surplus value?" which is the question that Michael L posed in the first post in this thread on Sunday. I agree with Paul C with that they can be a _significant_ source of surplus value. In solidarity, Jerry
- (OPE-L) Re: the productive macworker, (continued)
- (OPE-L) Re: the productive macworker, Gerald A. Levy Sun 16 May 2004, 23:37 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: the productive macworker, michael a. lebowitz Mon 17 May 2004, 02:17 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: the productive macworker, Gerald A. Levy Mon 17 May 2004, 12:25 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: the productive macworker, Michael Perelman Mon 17 May 2004, 21:14 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: the productive macworker, Gerald A. Levy Tue 18 May 2004, 10:58 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: the productive macworker, Paul Cockshott Tue 18 May 2004, 10:48 GMT
- Re: the productive macworker, Paul Bullock Tue 18 May 2004, 11:38 GMT
- Re: the productive macworker, michael a. lebowitz Thu 20 May 2004, 14:15 GMT
- Re: the productive macworker, Paul Bullock Fri 21 May 2004, 08:40 GMT