OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]
Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: (OPE-L) Re: Advisory Committee

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it. 

I once tried to break up a fight outside a pub. In return I was badly
beaten and ended up in hospital. But although my nose required
reconstructive surgery I felt I'd done the right thing.
Actually, my new nose was better than the old one.

Hold a vote of every member of OPE-L to decide whether the role of
moderator should be subject to rotation.

If a majority agree then the process can go further to arrange how
rotation will take place. If the majority disagree then nothing
happens.

In my view, this would be the scientific way to proceed. Asking for
diffuse opinions over a period of one week won't gather the necessary
information.



I have expressed all my diffuse opinions on this matter. Plus, I have
no more time for this controversy now that the forty papers I have to
grade are in.  I accept Ian's plan, and needn't explicitly cast my
vote.

Yours, Rakesh



-Ian.

On Mon, 17 May 2004 13:57:30 -0700, Rakesh Bhandari
<rakeshb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]