OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: (OPE-L) Re: Rakesh's Suggestion



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


To begin with, EVERY SINGLE WORD that I wrote earlier
in my "PS" was ENTIRELY ACCURATE.  And I don't
appreciate being called a "liar" when the facts show that not
to be true.

NEXT, this was a PRIVATE off-list message which I addressed
to Paul Z which you did not ask if you could share with the list.
This would be unacceptable behavior on ANY list.

NEXT, I cc'd both members of the AC, as well as Rakesh.
NEITHER member of the AC objected to the content of
my message.

NEXT, note that Rakesh's claim (repeated in 2 separate posts
yesterday) that I threatened to "intercept" his posts is NOT
TRUE.

NEXT, what Rakesh did not tell you was what he suggested
that we do about Paul Z.

In solidarity, Jerry

> just so that everyone knows that you are a liar, here is the record:

> X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
> Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 14:38:01 -0500 (EST)
> Subject: Re: OFF-LIST from OPE-L?
> From: <glevy@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <zarembka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> X-Priority: 3
> Importance: Normal
> Cc: <cottrell@xxxxxxx>, <glevy@xxxxxxxxx>, <fmoseley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>          <rakeshb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Paul and others:
>
> Yes, RB knew that this topic was to be taken off-list but
> he posted on-list anyway.  That's _twice_ that he has posted on-list
> on this subject after being informed that it was to be discussed
> off-list.
>
> So now let me make me make it CLEAR that if it happens again,
> then I _WILL_  use my "administrative authority" [!] to ensure that
> it is NOT discussed again on-list.



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]