OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

(OPE-L) Rakesh's suggestion



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


>  I am sure that most of those OPE-L'ers who are thankful or
> moderately thankful for your administration would agree that nine
> years from any one person is enough, that administration should be
> rotated, and that the advisory committee should appoint someone new.

Rakesh:

You are sure, are you?

Why don't we let list members *speak for themselves* without replies
from *either one of us*?  That is, I think you would have to agree that
list members will be more forthcoming in stating their perspectives
if they know that _both_ of us will read what they write without our
responding immediately to what they wrote.  I propose that we _both_
are silent on this question for *one week* while we _listen_ to what others
think.

*** Rakesh has suggested that the Advisory Committee appoint a new
coordinator.  Who agrees with that suggestion?  Why or why not? ***

In solidarity, Jerry



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]