IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> I am sure that most of those OPE-L'ers who are thankful or > moderately thankful for your administration would agree that nine > years from any one person is enough, that administration should be > rotated, and that the advisory committee should appoint someone new. Rakesh: You are sure, are you? Why don't we let list members *speak for themselves* without replies from *either one of us*? That is, I think you would have to agree that list members will be more forthcoming in stating their perspectives if they know that _both_ of us will read what they write without our responding immediately to what they wrote. I propose that we _both_ are silent on this question for *one week* while we _listen_ to what others think. *** Rakesh has suggested that the Advisory Committee appoint a new coordinator. Who agrees with that suggestion? Why or why not? *** In solidarity, Jerry
- (OPE-L) Re: old and new publishing technologies, (continued)
- (OPE-L) Re: old and new publishing technologies, Gerald A. Levy Sun 16 May 2004, 16:16 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: old and new publishing technologies, Rakesh Bhandari Sun 16 May 2004, 16:32 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: old and new publishing technologies, Michael Williams Sun 16 May 2004, 21:53 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: old and new publishing technologies, Rakesh Bhandari Sun 16 May 2004, 16:39 GMT
- (OPE-L) Rakesh's suggestion, Gerald A. Levy Sun 16 May 2004, 17:22 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Rakesh's suggestion, michael a. lebowitz Sun 16 May 2004, 20:10 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Rakesh's suggestion, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 17 May 2004, 00:11 GMT
- P.S re Venezuela, michael a. lebowitz Mon 17 May 2004, 02:12 GMT
- Re: P.S re Venezuela, Paul Zarembka Mon 17 May 2004, 02:19 GMT