OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: Freeman, Kliman, Wells eds. _The New Value Controversy



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


Rakesh retuned to OPE-L the other day.

 Levy writes:
 >Long overdue:
 Yes but worth the wait as the superb blurbs on which you cannot
 yourself to comment indicate.

What _you_ can not bring yourself to note is that I was giving free publicity to the book. Publicity that an editor solicited when he sent me mailings.

 >As I noted in a message sent on December 10, 2001,  the 'Edward
 >Elgar 2002' catalog indicated that this book was to be published in
 >May, 2002.>
 Are you criticizing the work for being late?

Noting that a book is being published late is not a criticism of the book itself.

Then what was the point? It certainly was not a substantive point. Nor a point consistent with the ethos of Mr. Solidarity.


  I think everyone on the list understood that.

 ps Levy, I was wondering whether you were planning on being OPE-L
 moderator for life? Shouldn't a Marxist have stepped down by now?

PS to Rakesh:

a) You can call me Jerry.

b) You will recall how much support you received on the list the last time
you made this suggestion.

Well we already lost several people because you are moderator.




c) To answer your "questions":

i) I never intended to become, nor do I seek the title of, "moderator for
life."


Good. Then if you do not seek it, announce your resignation.



ii) There is no "Marxist" position on how long someone should continue to serve as an Internet list coordinator.

In solidarity, Jerry



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]