IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Cyrus, In thinking about your argument that the value of the Iraqi oilfields is far exceeded by the cost of the work, I find reason in Milan Rai's rejoinder. The cost of the war is socialized; the profits from developing those fields are private. Imperialism can be costly for the populace and profitable for the few. This is why I have been objecting to David Y's argument about the spoils of imperialism which he has now indicated does not so easily apply to the US. Indeed. In short, I don't think the economic discrepancy to which you point means that the war and occupation were not economically motivated. Moreover, I think the US wants to put itself in a position to develop oil fields throughout the region (and otherwise maintain its position in the Gulf). So the profits it hopes to make are not confined to those from developing the Iraqi oil fields.
Yours, Rakesh
- value & money, Reuten, G.A.T.M. Mon 29 Mar 2004, 19:48 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: value & money, Reuten, G.A.T.M. Mon 29 Mar 2004, 19:59 GMT
- (OPE-L) Marx's financial articles, Gerald A. Levy Sat 27 Mar 2004, 12:00 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Reaping the spoils of war. Ousting Saddam could put U.S. oil giants in 'driver's seat', Rakesh Bhandari Fri 26 Mar 2004, 08:14 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: (OPE-L) Reaping the spoils of war. Ousting Saddam could put U.S. oil giants in 'driver's seat', Rakesh Bhandari Fri 26 Mar 2004, 16:49 GMT
- taking leave, Rakesh Bhandari Fri 26 Mar 2004, 17:22 GMT
- (OPE-L) Gloves Off March/April 2004 edition, Gerald A. Levy Fri 26 Mar 2004, 00:20 GMT
- (OPE-L) MIKE DAVIS PLANET OF SLUMS, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 25 Mar 2004, 23:08 GMT
- (OPE-L) Historical Explanation and Systematic Dialectics, glevy Thu 25 Mar 2004, 16:23 GMT