IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Andrew Brown wrote: > > The theory has the same core as it always did, viz. LTV, emphasis on levels of > abstraction, importance of VCC/OCC/TCC distinctions, emphasis on need to > incorporate concrete, empirical, historical and contingent material. Why do you consider VCC/OCC/TCC distinctions important. It has always struck me that only there is only one well defined concept there, the rest is handwaving.
- (OPE-L) RE: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_, (continued)
- (OPE-L) RE: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_, Gerald A. Levy Wed 24 Mar 2004, 14:12 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_, Andrew Brown Wed 24 Mar 2004, 14:53 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_, Gerald A. Levy Wed 24 Mar 2004, 22:51 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_, Andrew Brown Thu 25 Mar 2004, 10:54 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_, Paul Cockshott Thu 25 Mar 2004, 22:04 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_, Andrew Brown Mon 29 Mar 2004, 10:36 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_, Paul Cockshott Wed 31 Mar 2004, 22:25 GMT