IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
I found the part of the article emphasising Babbages chapter 'On Copying' particularly significant. I had not read that chapter and I myself consider that copying techniques - casting, printing, photography and photo-derived technologies are probably the most significant ways in which labour productivity has historically increased. This aspect of Babbages analysis does not seem to have been paid much attention by Marx. Rakesh Bhandari wrote: > > i suppose most have read this. very important discussion of Marx's > indebtedness to Babbage, as important as the debt to Richard Jones. > > Babbage: pioneer economist > by Nathan Rosenberg > > http://www.ex.ac.uk/BABBAGE/rosenb.html
- (OPE-L) nautical digression, (continued)
- (OPE-L) nautical digression, Gerald A. Levy Mon 29 Mar 2004, 22:25 GMT
- (OPE-L) comparing cells and theories, Gerald A. Levy Mon 29 Mar 2004, 22:25 GMT
- (OPE-L) the economic cell-form and form-analysis, Gerald A. Levy Tue 30 Mar 2004, 23:27 GMT
- (OPE-L) Babbage and Marx, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 24 Mar 2004, 17:56 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Babbage and Marx, Paul Cockshott Thu 25 Mar 2004, 22:03 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Babbage and Marx, Gerald A. Levy Fri 26 Mar 2004, 00:25 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Babbage and Marx, Paul Cockshott Sat 27 Mar 2004, 21:31 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Babbage and Marx, Gerald A. Levy Sun 28 Mar 2004, 14:33 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Babbage and Marx, Paul Cockshott Wed 31 Mar 2004, 22:25 GMT