OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

(OPE-L) Praxis Reports



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


Speaking of Gramsci, didn't he assert that human
practice _is_ philosophy and that we engage in a
"philosophy of praxis"?
 
Does that mean that those of us who joined yesterday
with an estimated eleven million others world-wide
in anti-war protests were engaging in the construction
and reconstruction of philosophy?  Or, does the
(re)construction of philosophy require _more than_
practice?
 
There were somewhere between 60,000 and 100,000
demonstrators in New York City yesterday. The _New
York Times_ reported yesterday, I read on another list,
that _2 million_ people demonstrated against the war in
Rome -- but I am skeptical of this estimate. 
 
Did _you_  demonstrate yesterday?  If so, could you give
us a brief   "praxis report"?
 
How could the anti-war movement be analyzed from a
Gramscian perspective?   From a systematic dialectical
perspective would it be theorized as contingency? And, if
so, could it be theorized as "contingency of a moment's content",
or a "major contingent external" or as a "minor contingent
external"? (*)   How could it be analyzed from other
perspectives including that of "Open Marxism"?
 
In solidarity, Jerry
 
(*) See Geert's "On 'Becoming Necessity' in an Organic
Systematic Dialectic: The Case of Creeping Inflation" in
Albritton, R. and Simoulidis, J. (eds.) (2003) _New Dialectics
and Political Economy_, pp. 42-59.  See especially  pp.43-44.
 
PS related to Ajit's question:  there was a sizable
correspondence between Sraffa and Gramsci.  Did a
discussion of Hegel and Hegelianism occur in those
exchanges?


Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]