Carchedi's TSS approach

[Ernesto Screpanti <screpanti@xxxxxxxx>]

At 23.55 19/02/2004 -0800, you wrote:
> "I do not agree with either the orthodox theory or
> Screpanti's, but that is irrelevant.  It is the charge
> of incoherence that -I would guess-  would attract the
> 'Damned Lies' bit."
>
> Oh! I had not seen this one and I'm not sure who wrote
> this. It could well be a good joke. Coherence is the
> last thing one can find in the TSS approach to Marx or
> for that matter anything. It is laughable that the
> author of the above quote thinks that such a mild
> criticism of an approach deserves to be called "dammed
> lies". I think the TSS is not only incoherent but
> simply nonsensical! ajit sinha

My charge against Charchedi's TSS approach was twofold:
Inconsistency: he uses Marx's reproduction conditions but then determines
prices without respecting these conditions;
dogmatism: Marx (as he interprets him) is always right.

Thus I understand that he who disagrees says "damned lies".

In solidarity

Ernesto


> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
> http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools