OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]
Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Fwd:

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it. 

Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:19:55 +0000
To: OPE-L <OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Phil Dunn <pscumnud@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: (OPE-L)  Ernesto's "Damned Lies"  ?
Cc:
Bcc:
X-Attachments:

"I do not agree with either the orthodox theory or
Screpanti's, but that is irrelevant.  It is the charge
of incoherence that -I would guess-  would attract the
'Damned Lies' bit."

Oh! I had not seen this one and I'm not sure who wrote
this. It could well be a good joke. Coherence is the
last thing one can find in the TSS approach to Marx or
for that matter anything. It is laughable that the
author of the above quote thinks that such a mild
criticism of an approach deserves to be called "dammed
lies". I think the TSS is not only incoherent but
simply nonsensical! ajit sinha


I am not sure who wrote this but if it is the same person who wrote:

I think the only way to intelectually  deal
with TSS folks is to completely ignore them--otherwise
it will be nothing but simple waste of energy

then he is not following his own precept. A case of internal
inconsistency, perhaps.

[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]