IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
A short additional comment in reply to Rakesh:
If we consider the unfolding of the *capital-form*
(capital in production/capital in circulation/capital
in distribution) we can observe a *logical* ordering.
The ordering of the historical development of capital,
however, does not follow the same order as the
logical ordering. Furthermore, in the further
determination of the capital-form the ordering doesn't
necessarily correspond to the historical order: e.g. there
is a logical unfolding of capital in distribution from the
distribution of capital within industrial capital (where
prices of production are formed) to the distribution of
capital between industrial and non-industrial capital
whereas the historical sequence was the reverse.
In solidarity, Jerry
|
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, (continued)
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Howard Engelskirchen Thu 12 Feb 2004, 17:32 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, gerald_a_levy Fri 13 Feb 2004, 13:51 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Andrew Brown Fri 13 Feb 2004, 15:15 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, gerald_a_levy Sat 14 Feb 2004, 18:23 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Gerald A. Levy Thu 19 Feb 2004, 14:54 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Howard Engelskirchen Thu 19 Feb 2004, 17:22 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Gerald A. Levy Fri 20 Feb 2004, 12:55 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Howard Engelskirchen Fri 20 Feb 2004, 16:41 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Roberto Veneziani article on TSS, Phil Dunn Sat 07 Feb 2004, 22:28 GMT