IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
Hello again Jairus:
>>> A possible way forward is to see how Hegel defines the
relationship between the history of philosophy and the 'system' of
philosophy in the introduction to his Lectures on the History of
Philosophy. He provides a solution of sorts but one which involves writing
'essential histories'... <<<
What is the exact reference? I looked again
through the
"Introduction" (116 pages in the Haldane and Simson
translation),
along with my marginal notes, and couldn't find the
section
you are alluding to.
In solidarity, Jerry
*PS on Hegel, Marx and History*:
For Hegel, the concept of history, in particular
'Universal History':
"is founded on the essential
and actual aim, which actually is
and will be realized in
it -- the plan of Providence; that, in short,
there is Reason in
history, must be decided on strictly philosophic
ground, and thus shown to
be essentially and in fact necessary"
(_Hegel's Philosophy
of Mind_, Wallace translation, Oxford: 1971:
p. 277).
Clearly, Marx's conception of historical reason
and necessity had
no place for Spirit and "the plan of
Providence." An appeal to necessity
from a materialist perspective was reconstituted
by Marx without an
appeal to Providence. Yet, aren't there
problematic *teleological*
presuppositions in a vision which suggests that when
the relations
of production block the further development of the
forces of
production a revolution ensues and a historically more
advanced mode
of production is ushered in? In both
the "Introduction" to the
_Contribution_ and in other writings including _Capital_ there is
an
assertion of historical *inevitability*.
In what sense are the trajectories
and outcomes of social
processes inevitable? In positing
inevitability
Marx may have been
influenced by Darwin, but one can not presume
that
if there are necessary and inevitable outcomes in the theory of natural
selection and evolution (and, in any event, even Darwinian theory
allows for historically contingent events, like climatic change, to alter
the evolutionary process)
then social history also has necessary and
inevitable outcomes.
|
- Re: (OPE-L) logical order and historical order, (continued)
- Re: (OPE-L) logical order and historical order, Rakesh Bhandari Sun 08 Feb 2004, 18:27 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, gerald_a_levy Wed 11 Feb 2004, 22:41 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, jairus Thu 12 Feb 2004, 15:39 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, gerald_a_levy Fri 13 Feb 2004, 14:19 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Gerald A. Levy Wed 18 Feb 2004, 15:05 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, jairus Fri 20 Feb 2004, 13:30 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Gerald A. Levy Sun 22 Feb 2004, 14:29 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Howard Engelskirchen Thu 12 Feb 2004, 17:32 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, gerald_a_levy Fri 13 Feb 2004, 13:51 GMT