IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Yes, I agree with what Ajit says: "I think the only way to intelectually deal with TSS folks is to completely ignore them--otherwise it will be nothing but simple waste of energy".
But now the subject is "Screpanti's lies". I do not feel offended to be considered a lier by Kliman. There was a discussion in Rome conference in which Kliman accused me of wrongly interpreting Marx. Other TSS believers accused me of not recognising the Marx was a precurson of the TSS approach.
Is it possible to discuss just about the theory of value and exploitation?
In solidarity
Ernesto
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, (continued)
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, Phil Dunn Sun 15 Feb 2004, 02:20 GMT
- (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, gerald_a_levy Sun 15 Feb 2004, 13:32 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, Riccardo Bellofiore Mon 16 Feb 2004, 17:20 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, ajit sinha Wed 18 Feb 2004, 10:06 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, Ernesto Screpanti Wed 18 Feb 2004, 13:54 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, Ernesto Screpanti Wed 18 Feb 2004, 13:33 GMT
- (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, Gerald A. Levy Wed 18 Feb 2004, 15:01 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Mino's Bible, Ernesto Screpanti Sat 28 Feb 2004, 09:25 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, Riccardo Bellofiore Wed 18 Feb 2004, 15:07 GMT