IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
Rakesh wrote:
>>>
I'm also not quite sure why our "moderator" decided to call attention to
Kliman's paper title as the list was discussing the relation between logic and
history and the oil industry. Now we are discussing Kliman's paper title without
any knowledge of its contents or the contents of the paper to which it responds.
Levy's unhealthy fixation on Kliman--no one was discussing him before Levy
brought him to our attention again--seems to disqualify him for moderation.
<<<
Oh, really .... Does anyone else on
the list besides
Rakesh share his perspective that I should be
'disqualified'
as "moderator" ??? (NB: I'm not asking for
Rakesh's
opinion. He has already given it.)
>>>
It was certainly an unwise choice to bring to this list's attention
Kliman's paper title only for the purpose of levelling accusations against him.
<<<
There was no "accusation" leveled against him.
The
title of the paper speaks for itself.
In solidarity, Jerry
|
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, (continued)
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, Ernesto Screpanti Wed 18 Feb 2004, 13:10 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, Gary Mongiovi Tue 17 Feb 2004, 18:28 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, Paul Zarembka Tue 17 Feb 2004, 18:40 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 17 Feb 2004, 20:35 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, Gerald A. Levy Tue 17 Feb 2004, 20:55 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, Gerald A. Levy Tue 17 Feb 2004, 20:47 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, ajit sinha Fri 20 Feb 2004, 07:55 GMT
- Carchedi's TSS approach, Ernesto Screpanti Sat 28 Feb 2004, 09:41 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?, Gary Mongiovi Tue 17 Feb 2004, 20:14 GMT