IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hi Andy: > Hegel-inspired systematic dialectics in one way or another tends to > suggest an identity or isomoprhism of thought and being, hence > necessary relation between logic and object. This is captured in > *dialectical* logic. Marx himself obviously thought Hegel himself > positied an *idealist* identity. So long as there is a necessary relation between logic and the object (in this case, the CMP), i.e. so long as the object (a material reality) itself has a logic which can be grasped through thought, then Hegel's idealist world-view can not be used as a valid criticism of systematic dialectics, imho. in solidarity, Jerry
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, (continued)
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Gerald A. Levy Sun 22 Feb 2004, 14:29 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Howard Engelskirchen Thu 12 Feb 2004, 17:32 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, gerald_a_levy Fri 13 Feb 2004, 13:51 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Andrew Brown Fri 13 Feb 2004, 15:15 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, gerald_a_levy Sat 14 Feb 2004, 18:23 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Gerald A. Levy Thu 19 Feb 2004, 14:54 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Howard Engelskirchen Thu 19 Feb 2004, 17:22 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Gerald A. Levy Fri 20 Feb 2004, 12:55 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Howard Engelskirchen Fri 20 Feb 2004, 16:41 GMT