IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hi Jerry and Howard, A small point: the word 'logic' here could usefully be unpacked. Howard's realist standpoint sometimes seems to marginalise the role of 'logic' since logic is human-made, independent of the object, for a realist. It is *formal* logic. Hegel-inspired systematic dialectics in one way or another tends to suggest an identity or isomoprhism of thought and being, hence necessary relation between logic and object. This is captured in *dialectical* logic. Marx himself obviously thought Hegel himself positied an *idealist* identity. I would make the same criticism of Hegel-inspired systematic dialecticians, despite their detailed rebuttals of such a view. Materialst dialectics sponsers a *dialectical* logic grasped in a materialst way: logic reflects matter (a view itself obviously in need of unpacking) It thus takes the best of both the realist and Hegelian views. Alas no time to defend these assertions. Many thanks, Andy
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, (continued)
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, jairus Fri 20 Feb 2004, 13:30 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Gerald A. Levy Sun 22 Feb 2004, 14:29 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Howard Engelskirchen Thu 12 Feb 2004, 17:32 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, gerald_a_levy Fri 13 Feb 2004, 13:51 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Andrew Brown Fri 13 Feb 2004, 15:15 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, gerald_a_levy Sat 14 Feb 2004, 18:23 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Gerald A. Levy Thu 19 Feb 2004, 14:54 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Howard Engelskirchen Thu 19 Feb 2004, 17:22 GMT
- (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order, Gerald A. Levy Fri 20 Feb 2004, 12:55 GMT