OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]
Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

(OPE-L) Re: s/v & c/v: macroeconomic categories only?

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it. 

Paul C wrote:

1. A contribution due to higher exploitation in that sector
2. A contribution due to sales of the product at a price above
   its value.
It is relatively easy, using i/o tables, to separate out these
two factors.
------------------------

If it is possible to show with an "embodied labor" perspective
and empirical data (in this case, from input-output tables)
sectoral rates of exploitation,  the extent to which commodities
are sold above or below their value, and the transfers of  surplus
value among firms, then this might be claimed as a significant
advantage of that (i.e. "embodied labor") perspective.  Or, is
it?

In solidarity, Jerry
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]