IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On second thought, some of my post from Sunday, February 1, on "s/v & c/v: macroeconomic categories only?" was confused. So, let me try again, expressing an issue as a question: * For those who hold that there is one rate of surplus value and that it is a macroeconomic rate, how do you show -- and empirically calculate -- the transfers of value and surplus value among capitalist firms both within an industry and in different branches of production? (This is a simplified posing of the question since there is _also_ the transfer of surplus value to non-industrial capitalists and to land owners. The transfers of surplus value to the state doesn't shouldn't pose a measurement problem) If it is not possible to show these transfers of surplus value, then why isn't -- or is it? -- merely a metaphor? I address the above to anyone who wants to answer it. In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Theories of value and price in contemporary Chinese Marxism., (continued)
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Theories of value and price in contemporary Chinese Marxism., valle Sun 08 Feb 2004, 23:55 GMT
- Fw: Convocatoria revista mexicana, Alejandro Valle Baeza Thu 05 Feb 2004, 13:08 GMT
- (OPE-L) Congres Marx International IV, glevy Thu 05 Feb 2004, 10:43 GMT
- (OPE-L) Mike Davis: A Deadly Plague of Slums, gerald_a_levy Thu 05 Feb 2004, 00:57 GMT
- (OPE-L) transfers of surplus value among capitalists, gerald_a_levy Wed 04 Feb 2004, 16:14 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) transfers of surplus value among capitalists, Cyrus Bina Mon 16 Feb 2004, 06:21 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: transfers of surplus value among capitalists, Gerald A. Levy Tue 17 Feb 2004, 14:40 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: transfers of surplus value among capitalists, Cyrus Bina Tue 17 Feb 2004, 22:42 GMT
- (OPE-L) RRPE final call for papers on "The History of Radical (Heterodox) Economics", gerald_a_levy Tue 03 Feb 2004, 23:05 GMT