IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Mike L asked (again): > We come back, then, to the question I posed earlier-- what happens > to the theory of relative surplus value once we no longer assume the real > wage given? The theory of relative surplus value then becomes what it always was -- relative. In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, (continued)
- Re: indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, ajit sinha Wed 12 Nov 2003, 05:23 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, gerald_a_levy Wed 12 Nov 2003, 12:37 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, ajit sinha Fri 14 Nov 2003, 06:52 GMT
- Re: indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, michael a. lebowitz Wed 12 Nov 2003, 15:48 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, gerald_a_levy Wed 12 Nov 2003, 21:28 GMT
- (OPE-L) the real wage and inflation, gerald_a_levy Thu 13 Nov 2003, 13:35 GMT
- Re: indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, ajit sinha Fri 14 Nov 2003, 06:03 GMT
- Re: indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, Rakesh Bhandari Fri 14 Nov 2003, 08:50 GMT
- Re: indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, ajit sinha Fri 14 Nov 2003, 10:15 GMT