IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hi, Paul Z. Thanks for the report on the conference. > In general, the plenary sessions in my opinion were less useful than > last time (e.g., Hardt of *Empire* fame didn't seem very knowledgeable > about Marxism and made no reference to class that I heard; Wolff called > for "revolution" but with no details). Little time for audience > reactions was available as the "stars" ran the clock (the chairs so > permitting for the plenaries I got to); remember when interactions with > audiences were mandatory and "stars" were not stars? <snip> A question (for anyone on the list): as educators we often (or do we?) recognize the need for the implementation of progressive, innovative and empowering pedagogy. Yet, the form of scholarly conferences (whether of traditional academic societies or of progressives and Marxians) has remained very traditional. Are there any radically different ways of organizing in-person (i.e. non-on-line)conferences that should be tried? In solidarity, Jerry
- New marxist journal, valle Sun 09 Nov 2003, 18:32 GMT
- (OPE-L) Globalisation: A Perspective for Labour, Rakesh Bhandari Sun 09 Nov 2003, 17:56 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Marxism and the World Stage CFP, gerald_a_levy Sun 09 Nov 2003, 16:14 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Marxism and the World Stage CFP, Paul Zarembka Mon 10 Nov 2003, 16:02 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Marxism and the World Stage CFP, glevy Tue 11 Nov 2003, 13:59 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, Paul Cockshott Fri 07 Nov 2003, 10:23 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: (OPE-L) indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, michael a. lebowitz Sat 08 Nov 2003, 23:12 GMT
- (OPE-L) indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, gerald_a_levy Sun 09 Nov 2003, 13:47 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, ajit sinha Mon 10 Nov 2003, 10:36 GMT