IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Paul C wrote: > This relates to prices not to values. A fall in the price of oil would > just be a redistribution of value between property owners unless it was > brought about by a change in the production technology. So a fall in the price of oil couldn't have the indirect effect of altering real wages? Are you assuming that real wages can only change when there has been a change in labor productivity? In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: (OPE-L) subscription problems, (continued)
- Re: (OPE-L) subscription problems, Costas Lapavitsas Thu 06 Nov 2003, 13:18 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Dynamic value and natural price, Paul Cockshott Thu 06 Nov 2003, 10:11 GMT
- (OPE-L) indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, gerald_a_levy Thu 06 Nov 2003, 14:14 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, paul cockshott Thu 06 Nov 2003, 15:13 GMT
- (OPE-L) indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value, gerald_a_levy Thu 06 Nov 2003, 16:04 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Dynamic value and natural price, Ian Wright Fri 07 Nov 2003, 21:51 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Dynamic value and natural price, gerald_a_levy Fri 07 Nov 2003, 22:01 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Dynamic value and natural price, Ian Wright Fri 07 Nov 2003, 23:01 GMT
- (OPE-L) accounting for productive and unproductive labour, gerald_a_levy Sat 08 Nov 2003, 13:30 GMT