IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
Has anyone recently conducted an empirical
investigation using
input-output data which explored the capacity of a) a given
capitalist social formation and b) the world-wide economy to
provide for the material needs of workers _following_ the
socialization of the productive forces, an end to 'luxury' production,
and the abolition of
'waste' of resources on the realization of
surplus value,
etc.?
To rephrase the question and put it in context: Many
Marxists have
argued -- at least going back to Engels- that
the current state of
the productive forces had developed to a point where with
the
redistribution of wealth following a socialist revolution
and with
a change in the relations of production that would
eliminate the
waste of labor and means of production that a
society could,
among other things, provide for the material needs
of people in
that society and simultaneously reduce the labor time
required
to produce that output. To quote
Engels:
"no individual can throw on the shoulders of others his
share in
productive labor, this natural condition of human
existence; and
in which, on the other hand, productive labor, instead of
being
a means of subjugating men, will become a means of
their
emancipation, by offering each individual the opportunity
to
develop all his facilities, physical and mental, in all
directions and
exercise them to the full -- in which, therefore
productive labor will
become a pleasure instead of a burden. Today this is
no longer a
fantasy, no longer a pious wish. *With the
present development
of the productive forces*, the increase
in production that would follow
the very fact of the socialization of the productive
forces, coupled
with the abolition of the barriers and disturbances, and
the waste
of products and means of production, will suffice, with
everyone
doing his share of work, to reduce the time required for
labor to a
point which, measured by our present conceptions,
will be small
indeed." (Engels, _Anti-Duhring_, emphasis added,
JL).
My question seeks to empirically test this
proposition. Suppose
we examine input-output tables for all nations:
couldn't estimates
be derived of the capacity of society to provide for
needs and wants
(assuming that there are assumptions made about the
redistribution
of wealth and the change in the division of labor,
etc.)? "With the
current development of the productive
forces", what 'basket' of goods
could workers on average expect? ... and what
would be reasonable
estimates concerning the working
time/worker to produce that
output? Has anyone done such an
empirical study? Are there
problems with the way in which I have posed these
questions? If so,
how would you re-pose the questions?
I am particularly interested in an *international*
empirical study
because of the differences in standards of living
internationally
among workers (especially given the presence of mass
poverty
in many areas of the world). Just how
big is the international
'pie' and how big a slice can each worker
expect?
In solidarity, Jerry
|
- Re: science, (continued)
- Re: science, Michael Perelman Thu 30 Oct 2003, 17:37 GMT
- OPE-L Interview with Marx, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 30 Oct 2003, 05:46 GMT
- (OPE-L) Massimo De Angelis' Home Page, gerald_a_levy Tue 28 Oct 2003, 12:33 GMT
- (OPE-L) Review of _Keynesianism, Social Conflict and Political Economy_ by Massimo de Angelis, gerald_a_levy Sat 25 Oct 2003, 08:28 GMT
- (OPE-L) an empirical question re socialism, gerald_a_levy Thu 23 Oct 2003, 13:08 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: an empirical question re socialism, gerald_a_levy Fri 24 Oct 2003, 13:06 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: an empirical question re socialism, Paul Cockshott Fri 24 Oct 2003, 15:22 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: an empirical question re socialism, gerald_a_levy Fri 24 Oct 2003, 21:26 GMT
- Interview with Tariq Ali, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 23 Oct 2003, 01:06 GMT