IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
I do not recall whether or not this question has appeared before on OPE-L nor do I know whether all of our colleagues on the list are aware. Chapter 3, vol III,( international publishers´edition 1967, pgs. 49-69) deals with "The relation of the rate of profit to the rate of surplus value". The chapter is divided under two main headings: I. s´ constante and II. s´ variable. Under the second heading there are three subcases. My question is this: Why is that Marx does not consider the possibility of v being constant and C (total capital) being variable? This case is just not discussed at all. What happened? Did he forget? Paulo
- (OPE-L) "What Keeps Capitalism going" : The Movie, gerald_a_levy Fri 17 Oct 2003, 01:17 GMT
- Preobrazhensky's multiplier, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 16 Oct 2003, 16:53 GMT
- Re: Preobrazhensky's multiplier, Paul Cockshott Fri 17 Oct 2003, 09:42 GMT
- OPE-L Preobrazhensky's multiplier, Rakesh Bhandari Fri 17 Oct 2003, 17:47 GMT
- SUBCASE MISSING ON CHAPTER 3, VOL III, Francisco Paulo Cipolla Wed 15 Oct 2003, 18:46 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Subcase missing on Chapter 3, Vol III, gerald_a_levy Thu 16 Oct 2003, 12:49 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Subcase missing on Chapter 3, Vol III, Francisco Paulo Cipolla Thu 16 Oct 2003, 19:09 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Subcase missing on Chapter 3, Vol III, gerald_a_levy Fri 17 Oct 2003, 13:06 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Subcase missing on Chapter 3, Vol III, Francisco Paulo Cipolla Fri 17 Oct 2003, 18:34 GMT